10/20/2021 0 Comments Sling Player App Osx
Easy hand-off to AppleTV or Chromecast. Optimized remote control for smaller screen. Watch and control live or recorded TV.
Sling Player App Osx Mac For WhateverIf you’re happy with a Windows PC or Linux PC, or anything else, I’m happy for you. I find it entertaining when people feel compelled to tell you/me how much they don’t want the thing you’re reviewing or writing about because they use something else. Click the General tab.If you don’t like Macs/Apple or don’t want a Mac for whatever your reasons are, you can pretty much stop here and find something else to do with your time. Here's what you may need to do: Choose System Preferences from the Apple menu. I was a little blown away! The same game rules apply!Installing the SlingPlayer plug-in on OS X Mavericks To allow SlingPlayer to run on OS X 10.9 Mavericks, you may need to perform a few extra steps to adjust your security settings when installing the plug-in.Otherwise I was quite happy just using my MacBook Pro simply because I could use it in any room at any time. Sure I appreciate the faster performance, but I found myself only using my Mac Pro when I knew a process was going to take a long time to complete. As I stated above, I realized with my last Mac Pro that I wasn’t really a Mac Pro customer. I’m doing this review/comparison simply to answer the question, “as a photographer would I be better off spending my money on the NEW iMac Retina 5K Display or a Mac Pro?” If you’re a videographer and you’re a Mac user then you probably already have the new Mac Pro because you demanded the fastest Mac you could get to render your videos on a daily basis.When I saw the rumors that Apple was going to release a radically different design for the Mac Pro, to be quite honest I was only mildly interested. And watch the app schedule it with a reminder.If you’re reading the rest of this post then I’ll assume that you’re a Mac user or thinking of becoming one.The next thing I’d like to get out of the way is that if you’re looking for a Mac Pro review that tells you this new Mac Pro is better than the previous Mac Pro with all the benchmarks to back it up, then you’d probably be better served by other reviewers who have targeted the performance of the new model vs.I loaded the latest version of my Adobe Creative Cloud applications on it as well as a few utilities that I use such as ScreenFlow. I got the opportunity to test a Mac Pro standard configuration in my studio for a few weeks. Well we know the latter didn’t happen, so now it was time to test the performance. However, I said to myself perhaps if the performance (for what I do) is significantly better and the price point for an entry model was $2,500 or less, I’d consider getting one.At the time I did the tests back in May, I really wasn’t expecting to run these tests again. Actually I was wrong! Now fast forward to November and I have brand new iMac Retina 5k here to review and test. My assumption was that the Mac Pro would certainly be at least twice as fast at everything I threw at it than my 2012 MacBook Pro Retina Display Mac. This is when I realized that in order to see significant speed improvements the software you’re testing not only needs to be optimized for the faster processors, but also it would need to take advantage of the multiple cores. With the new iMac Retina 5k there was even less of a difference. On every test I threw at it the Mac Pro outperformed my now two-year-old MacBook Pro, but in some cases it was only slightly faster. Actually it is faster at (almost) everything! Just not by a margin of two. Luckily I was able to reassemble most of them with a couple minor exceptions that I will outline below:When will a Mac Pro significantly outperform any other Mac?As I said above, I was wrong in my assumption that the Mac Pro would be at least twice as fast at everything. At this point I now have a new iMac Retina 5K Display to compare as well. Where I saw the biggest differences was in (no surprise) video rendering and processes that take longer than a minute or so anyway. They’ve got multiple cores too. Photoshop CC definitely takes advantage of multiple cores and now has Open CL support. However, I not only now have a new Mid 2014 MacBook Pro Retina that is faster than my old one, but I also have a base model iMac Retina 5k to compare too.UPDATED TEST RESULTS What I do as a photographerAs a photographer I spend most of my time in Adobe Lightroom 5 and Adobe Photoshop CC. However, even doing video tasks the iMac held its own and really started bringing into question “when would I ever want a Mac Pro?” When I ran the tests in May the Mac Pro was significantly faster at video tasks than my two year old MacBook Pro. This is one of the few times that I see a progress bar in Lightroom because it does take time to do it. DNG (Digital Negative) format. I convert my RAW files into. All of these applications are 64bit native and that means that they’ll take advantage of additional RAM.My first test was one of the things I do after every shoot. This of course left me scratching my head, but I have a couple of caveats to bring up. Huh! What? Wait a minute! It was actually slightly (less than a second) faster than the Mac Pro. NEF RAW files into DNG format.First on the MacBook Pro it took 14 minutes 35 secondsOn the Mac Pro the same conversion took 12 minutes 12 seconds.OK, ready for this? On the NEW iMac Retina 5K a 435 16MP conversion took 11 minutes 39 seconds. This we can probably say is faster on the MacBook Pro over the iMac because it’s a faster processor and faster drive, but it doesn’t really explain why it would be faster than the Mac Pro. We can argue this one more, but just for kicks I ran the same test on my NEW Mid 2014 MacBook Pro Retina with a Core i7 Haswell processor and SSD drive (the iMac has a Fusion drive) and it was even faster at 9 minutes 56 seconds. They are from the same camera and a similar portrait shoot, just not the same exact images as before. I can’t see where that would make too big of a difference though. Yes I converted 435 16.2 MP files from my Nikon D4, but they weren’t the same exact images. The only caveat as I mentioned in the introduction was that I didn’t have all the same exact files from the May test. Then the second part of the process is applying whatever settings you want to control how your HDR looks.The first part on the 2012 MacBook Pro took 12.70 seconds and on the Mac Pro it took 9.10 secondsThe second part on the 2012 MacBook Pro took 13.00 seconds and on the Mac Pro it took 11.13 seconds.Since I had the exact same RAW files for this test I ran it on the iMac:The first part on the iMac took 10.75 seconds and the second part took 10.75 seconds. The first part is simply combining the three (or more) images together and aligning them. This is a two-part process. John deere gator serial number locationThe first as a photographer is to tell my story. Next it was time to look at what I do as a Photographer when it comes to videoI use video in a couple of different ways. We’ll get to that at the end. As you can see from the results above, the Mac Pro wins on every test as you would expect it to, but the results (even if it was twice as fast in every case) may not justify the difference in cost. If it was faster at something that I rarely do, then I really don’t care as much. I had no doubts that this is where the Mac Pro would really shine. Of course I need to export those videos out and this can take a while depending on the length of the video. These screen recordings are done with ScreenFlow and since the editing I do is pretty simple I can edit these right in ScreenFlow. The next way that I use video and probably the way that I use video the most often is to record my Creative Cloud TV video podcasts. I use Adobe Premiere Pro CC to assemble those videos and then output them to share (usually on YouTube). I was not disappointed.The first test I ran was an export of an hour-long edited video out of ScreenFlow.On the MacBook Pro this export took 60 minutesOn the Mac Pro this export took 33 minutes.On the iMac Retina 5K this export took 35 minutes.It gets better in Adobe Premiere Pro CC and the Adobe Media Encoder CC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorVanessa ArchivesCategories |